Barcodes vs QR Codes

What is a Barcode –
The traditional barcode is the system which many companies use to scan the prices of goods and products which are being sold in stores. The barcode is a series of numbers that dictates a category of product or good, and is used to track pricing, as well as to keep inventory in stores. Whenever a product is scanned, and the barcode is rung up at the point of sale (POS) system, the inventory is updated, and the accounts are updated as far as sales and revenues coming in to the retailer. But, the traditional barcode is also limited in what it can store, how much information can be obtained by a company, and what information is is capable of generating, when the business, employees, or managers, are making inquiries as to that particular product.

What are QR Codes –
QR codes (or quick resource codes) are a similar system that is being used by more and more companies today. They are similar to the traditional barcode because they store data about the product being sold. But, the QR code is also capable of storing far more information than traditional barcodes, and they can also store several data types, which traditional bar codes are not capable of doing.

Many companies consider the question of barcodes vs QR codes when they are choosing the manner in which to keep track of goods sold and inventory on hand. Many are going with QR codes due to the fact that they can be scanned faster than barcodes, any missing data can be restored in the code, the structure can be appended (allowing for printing the code on a narrow surface), and several other great feataures which companies have found, when deciding on barcodes vs QR codes.

Benefits of QR Codes over Barcodes –
There are many reasons why companies choose QR codes when debating on the issue of barcodes vs QR codes. As far as data types, barcodes are one dimensional numeric codes, and they are capable of up to 20 characters. This is simple for keeping track of inventory that leaves and enters a store, ensuring that retailers are constantly aware of what they have on hand. But, when choosing QR codes, the business owners will learn that these codes are two dimensional codes, capable of storing data horizontally and vertically. Therefore, the QR codes can hold up to 7100 characters of data, rather than the much lower number which barcodes hold. Additionally, the QR codes hold characters, numbers, symbols, text, and control codes. Due to the fact that the codes are horizontal and vertical, they store the same exact amount as the barcode can, but in only 1/10 of the space the barcode requires. So, when choosing barcodes vs QR codes, in the arena of data storage, QR codes are far greater at holding and keeping storage, and can even store text messages or website addresses.

The next issue when deciding barcodes vs QR codes is the question of data restoration. Due to several factors, both barcodes and QR codes may sometimes be damaged (dirt). When the barcodes are damaged, they are not capable or reading any data, and they cannot be used to scan. On the flip side QR codes can still be scanned. Additionally, when damaged, the QR code can still recover from 30 to 35% of the damaged data, words, or symbols, making the QR code far superior in the capabilities or restoring data, or recovering information which has been lost or damaged for any reason.

As far as the speed, precision, and scanning position, when considering barcodes vs QR codes, many companies are again choosing QR codes as the choice option for their code types. When using barcodes, the exact position has to be perfect, otherwise they will not scan; this slows down the speed of clerks at busy stores, and in some cases, requires them to manually input the codes, if the code is extremely wet, or may be dirty due to where the product was located in the store. But, with QR codes, the individual working the counter can pretty much scan that code from anywhere, any distance, and any position. Due to the three positions and the detection patterns on the QR codes (which are located in the three corners of the code), they are going to be read no matter where they are scanned. Any reader can locate those codes, and easily detect the patterns, in order to give a proper readout of what products are being scanned. Therefore, this makes for faster scanning, and overall quicker checkout for customers waiting in line. So, when considering barcodes vs QR codes for speed and precision, QR codes are also far superior to the traditional barcodes which most retailers have chosen to use in their stores in the past.

Another factor to consider in choosing barcodes vs QR codes is the structured appended feature. With barcodes, data cannot be broken up by the reader. But, with larger QR codes, the information can be segmented, in up to 16 smaller sized squares. In turn, the QR codes allow any information to be stretched out on to an object, allowing the QR code to be printed out on smaller, and narrower areas. This makes for ease or reading, and more flexibility by the companies who use the QR code, and deciding where to place the QR codes on any objects or products they sell.

Conclusion –
For the companies who are deciding between barcodes vs QR codes, you will find that there are several reasons to choose the QR code over the barcode option. From more restoration of data if it is lost, to the ease of reading the codes, various methods of reading codes, and the variety of characters, numbers, symbols, text, and figures which can be used in designating codes to the products which are sold. So, when deciding methods to track inventory and sales, companies will find that QR codes are far superior to the older option of choosing barcodes for their retail facilities.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply